Welcome to PCForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

AMD still refusing to have a chipset business

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Chips RSS
Next:  DDR RAM Question.......  
Author Message
Rui Pedro Mendes S

External


Since: Oct 16, 2003
Posts: 7



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 1:59 pm
Post subject: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business
Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>chips (more info?)

From the inquirer:

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12576

"The 9XX socket, whatever that turns out to be, will support
533/666MHz memory controllers, as well as supporting Hyperthreading
1.05 and Retry 2.4K/2.8K MTs AMD has at least three chipset partners
it's relying on to support its future processors. The roadmap shows
that it will still introduce reference designs for future chipsets,
but it is essentially relying on the usual suspects to help support
its microprocessors."

"The usual suspects in this case are Via, SIS, Nvidia and, can we
count ATI as a future usual suspect? The documents refer to chipset
firms A, B, and C â and X. X isn't IBM is it?"

Maybe the Nvidia will be good enough*, but I would feel more secure
if AMD had their own boards with their own chipsets like Intel does.

* the new version of the Nforce 3 with Gigabit Ethernet, seems
to appear (early ?) next year:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12566

"As a fact, we know that Nforce 3 250 -- the one with full speed
Hypetransport 16 uplink and 16 downlink with native Gigabit LAN is
still not in production but it isn't so far away."

--
http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/

..pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young'-Menander (342-292 BC)
Europe | Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94

 >> Stay informed about: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business 
Back to top
Login to vote
Derek Baker

External


Since: Apr 23, 2004
Posts: 37



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 4:18 pm
Post subject: Re: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro" <rps.RemoveThis@rena.mat.uc.pt> wrote in message
news:bonr3d$fls$1@rena.mat.uc.pt...
 > From the inquirer:
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12576</font" target="_blank">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12576</font</a>>
 >
 > "The 9XX socket, whatever that turns out to be, will support
 > 533/666MHz memory controllers, as well as supporting Hyperthreading
 > 1.05

As the Inq has now corrected it, it is Hypertransport 1.05.

Shame as hyperthreading is the only feature of the Pentium that interests
me, would love to see it on AMD processors.Sad

--
Derek<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ed4

External


Since: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: 218



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 4:18 pm
Post subject: Re: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:18:20 -0000, "Derek Baker"
<me.RemoveThis@XYZderekbaker.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:

 >"Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro" <rps.RemoveThis@rena.mat.uc.pt> wrote in message
 >news:bonr3d$fls$1@rena.mat.uc.pt...
  >> From the inquirer:
  >>
<font color=green>  >> <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12576</font" target="_blank">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12576</font</a>>
  >>
  >> "The 9XX socket, whatever that turns out to be, will support
  >> 533/666MHz memory controllers, as well as supporting Hyperthreading
  >> 1.05
 >
 >As the Inq has now corrected it, it is Hypertransport 1.05.
 >
 >Shame as hyperthreading is the only feature of the Pentium that interests
 >me, would love to see it on AMD processors.Sad

2005-2006
AMD - A day late and a dollar short as usual.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business 
Back to top
Login to vote
Robert Myers

External


Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 142



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:25 pm
Post subject: Re: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:18:20 -0000, "Derek Baker"
<me DeleteThis @XYZderekbaker.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:

<snip>

 >
 >Shame as hyperthreading is the only feature of the Pentium that interests
 >me, would love to see it on AMD processors.Sad

Any chance you would care to share the reasons for your interest?

RM<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business 
Back to top
Login to vote
Derek Baker

External


Since: Apr 23, 2004
Posts: 37



(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Robert Myers" <rmyers.TakeThisOut@rustuck.com> wrote in message
news:4i70rvkrlvq1sf60hbdj9ojlcu8qovobv2@4ax.com...
 > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:18:20 -0000, "Derek Baker"
 > <me.TakeThisOut@XYZderekbaker.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
 >
 > <snip>
 >
  > >
  > >Shame as hyperthreading is the only feature of the Pentium that interests
  > >me, would love to see it on AMD processors.Sad
 >
 > Any chance you would care to share the reasons for your interest?
 >
 > RM
 >

Er, it makes some programs go faster?Smile

--
Derek<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business 
Back to top
Login to vote
Keith R. Williams

External


Since: Nov 02, 2003
Posts: 66



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:01 am
Post subject: Re: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <1068572287.205854.RemoveThis@ananke.eclipse.net.uk>,
me.RemoveThis@XYZderekbaker.eclipse.co.uk says...
 > "Robert Myers" <rmyers.RemoveThis@rustuck.com> wrote in message
 > news:4i70rvkrlvq1sf60hbdj9ojlcu8qovobv2@4ax.com...
  > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:18:20 -0000, "Derek Baker"
  > > <me.RemoveThis@XYZderekbaker.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
  > >
  > > <snip>
  > >
   > > >
   > > >Shame as hyperthreading is the only feature of the Pentium that interests
   > > >me, would love to see it on AMD processors.Sad
  > >
  > > Any chance you would care to share the reasons for your interest?
  > >
  > > RM
  > >
 >
 > Er, it makes some programs go faster?Smile

Where "some" << "all" and indeed "most" >> "some".

They don't call it "Hype"-rthreading for notin' Wink

--
Keith<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: AMD still refusing to have a chipset business 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Chipset I810E, FSB 100MHZ and PC-133? - Chipset I810E, FSB 100MHZ and PC-133? The spec of Chipset I810E says support of FSB 133MHz, support of not more than PC100. The FSB is not driving the memory bus? Where could I read about it?

Chipset I810E, FSB 133MHZ and no support of PC-133? - Chipset I810E, FSB 133MHZ and no support of PC-133? The spec of Chipset I810E it supporta a FSB 133MHz, does not support more than PC100. The FSB is not driving the RAM memory? Where could I read about it?

WANTED: Embedded software developers - Wanted software developers with 3+ years experience in developing embedded systems using C++, vxWorks, and Object oriented eesign and development. Please email full resumes and contact info to kayd@4cs.com

Is T-Bred B faster and cooler than T-Bred A? - This page http://www.motherboardfaqs.com/article.php?17.255 says: "The Thoroughbred "B" is simply a revised version of the A core, with one major kick - speed! These chips feature the usual optimizations on an instruction level...

Help me ID this ATI graphics card - I have this old graphics card which I am trying to identify. It is labelled Sept 1999. The circuit board has a logo on the circuit side which says "graphics by ATI Rage 128" On the components side of the circuit board it says "&quot...
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Chips All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]