Welcome to PCForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

ASROCK versus ASUS

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> ASUS RSS
Next:  Video card problem  
Author Message
somebody1

External


Since: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 15



(Msg. 31) Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 6:50 am
Post subject: Re: ASROCK versus ASUS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>mainboard>asus, others (more info?)

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 06:39:49 +0100, "K-Tel Ronco"
<sameoldnonexistantip.TakeThisOut@customerofplusnet.com.not> wrote:

 ><SNIP>
 >" I am told that Asrock is a cheaper range "
 >
 >I have to agree with that. In a number of years of building The Asrock is
 >the only boards I Have ever had a failure on (and I have used some crap).
 >Not a catastrophic failure I may add, rear usb ports died. However I bought
 >it thinking it was a quality item. I forget the model, was one of these
 >maplin bundles that at the time seemed like a great deal.

I consider Asus No1, and maybe my logic is flawed, but I wouldn't buy
a budget board from Asustek. My guess is the likes of Shuttle, EPoX
and Soltek knows much more about how to build a cheap board.
They've been at it for much longer, and have had decent success with
it too.

ancra<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: ASROCK versus ASUS 
Back to top
Login to vote
Doug Ramage

External


Since: Jan 03, 2004
Posts: 67



(Msg. 32) Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:52 pm
Post subject: Re: ASROCK versus ASUS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"~misfit~" <misfit61nz.DeleteThis@yahoomung.co.nz> wrote in message
news:hc2cc.5489$d%6.96259@news.xtra.co.nz...
 > Piotr Makley wrote:
  > > "~misfit~" <misfit61nz.DeleteThis@yahoomung.co.nz> wrote:
  > >
   > >> Wise people in the know who
   > >> weren't overly image-conscious bought Pulsar and saved
   > >> approximately 40% and got the exact same ultra-reliable watch.
   > >> They're made in the same factory, they just go to a different
   > >> 'finishing line' where they are fitted into either a Seiko or
   > >> a Pulsar case.
  > >
  > > But what about quality control? Is that different?
 >
 > No, not at all. I happened to be in a jewellers shop when a Seiko/Pulsar
rep
 > was there, just as they bought out the Pulsar brand. He was explaining it
to
 > the shop owner. The internals come off the same production-line, go
through
 > the same QT, and are then diverted to either the Seiko or Pulsar
'finishing'
 > line (for fitting into cases), depending on demand.
 >
 > As I said, my Pulsar hasn't given me a moments trouble in the 10 years
I've
 > had it. I told a guy who owned a Seiko (that he paid heaps more for) about
 > it and he didn't believe me until I showed him that they have the same
 > 'double
 > wave' logo on the back (both watches are 100m water resist).
 > --
 > ~misfit~
 >

Thanks for the heads-up, ~misfit~.

Just bought a nice Pulsar watch for £19.99 + Vat (Vat = 17.5% sales tax, in
UK). I might have passed on it for being too cheap.
--
Doug Ramage<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: ASROCK versus ASUS 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Asus P4C800-E Dlx & WD740 Raptor (Jumpers & BIOS) - RE: P4C800-E Dlx. and SATA WD740 Raptor How should I set the jumpers and BIOS in regards to Spread Spectrum? I don't know what this feature is. Also, I don't think I would want the PC to start in standby, so I would leave that jumper disabled. Why would...

Asus A7N8X-VM versus MSI K7N2 Delta-L + Geforce4MX400 - Hi I would like to upgrade my pc (game one) to allow playing doom3. I have MSI KT3 ultra2 + XP1600+ + 512 DDR + Geforce2MX400 64MB Doom3 doesn't go well on this system :-( for a budget price I think of going on a AMD XP2600 (keep my 512 MB DDR 2700...

PC2100 versus PC2700 - Greetings all! I am wondering how much of a performance boost you see if you use PC2700 instead of PC2100? My motherboard, an ASUS P4V8X-X, supports either 1GB of PC2700 or 1.5GB of PC2100 and I can't decide which is the better way to go. The PC is....

P4P800 HD list S-ATA versus IDE - Configuration: P4P800 1x HD SATA (FAT32) 1x HD IDE (FAT32) configured as none master (jumper off) I have configured the SATA HD as first HD in the BIOS SATA HD has three prim. partitions (Multiboot) IDE HD has one prim partition, used as data backup..

Artic Silver 3 versus 5 - Is their a noticable difference in the two? Just wondering if anyone has an opinion, TIA. -- ..
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> ASUS All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]