On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 02:05:45 GMT, Harley wrote:
>Can anyone give me some input on the relative importance of the speed
>of compact flash cards. I have read many conflicting thoughts and
>price really seems to be the factor. Many brands don't advertise this
>info.
Transcend 30x or 45x are very good value for money, as I understand
the tables in the CF Performance Database over at Rob Galbraith's:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-6425" target="_blank">http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-6425</a>
The digicams there are very "Pro" and the results are such that some
cards work nice in one camera and not so good in others
>Does the read/write speed really make a difference? I'm using a Canon
>A80.
Sure it does - even in my A60 the equally sized but much cheaper (700
NOK in a store vs the 'online' price at 400 NOK for the cheap,
generic one), labeled "Made by Toshiba" CF gets much hotter when used
(i.e. not good for the memory chips) and is slower when I use my
card-reader. The difference may be 50-100% in favor of the Transcend
CF ("30x").
>Also in terms of quality and relibility, how does Sandisk rate?
They're pretty good on those parameters, but I don't care much for
the dividing of the product-range (which is clever for them, not me)
into Ultra, Ultra II, Extreme and some "regular" or "standard" ones.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Compact Flash Speeds