Welcome to PCForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Compatibility

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Matrox RSS
Related Topics:
Video memory mapping - I'm not sure if this is a question for a videocard group or a mainboard group or in fact where it belongs. The videocard group is full of spam so I'm posting this to matrox and nvidia because those two are I have a series of..

Please help - my new computer's G550 image seems "lifeless" - Hi all, I've just received my new computer with the G550 and, frankly, I'm - the image appears I'm afraid my English is too poor to convey my exact What I mean is that my immediate reaction was to try and

G450 eTV 4gig Limit? - I have been with capture settings with my Matrox G450 eTV with the purpose of writing to DVD. After much testing, I have that the best setting is RGB. The only problem with this setting is that the AVI files become..

Matrox Marvel G400 problems under XP - Hi, When I first install my old Matrox Marvel G400 under Windows XP it works well as a graphics card with any supported I also manage to update to the 'real' XP driver with VCR support found at without problems. But..

Capture settings for DVD? - I need someone with more than me to suggest capture settings that will translate into DVD with an video and audio quality. At the moment if I capture using Ulead Studio and my G450 eTV in any mpg format, when I write it do DVD the..
Next:  Matrox: Vista OS?  
Author Message
Canid

External


Since: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 4



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:01 pm
Post subject: Compatibility
Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>videocards>matrox (more info?)

We just bought a 21" Gateway FPD2185W Monitor ... recommended
resolution 1680x1050
It doesn't get on well with our current Graphics card, so we are
looking at getting a new one.
I was looking at the Matrox Millennium P650 Video Card, but I am not
sure whether it would be compatible with our current system.

The Matrox Millennium P650 Video Card has the following minimum system
requirements:
System: AGP 3.0 compliant
128 MB RAM
600 MHz CPU
Microsoft® Windows® 2000, Windows® XP, or Linux

We have an AOpen AX34 Pentium III FC-PGA 133MHz 4x AGP ATX MotherBoard
I assume we would have to replace it?
As far as computer knowledge goes, I am a caveman with a silicon club,
so go easy on me. Smile

We do not really want the added expense of replacing the motherboard,
nor the fuss of an internet return should the GPU not work for some
other reason (none of the local shops carry Matrox).
No one in the house is a gamer, we use the computer for websurfing, and
graphic art (Photoshop & an art tablet).
The local computer shop suggested the MX4000 as an inexpensive
alternative... I assume they meant the GeForce MX4000.
As we only have a single monitor setup, is it worth the bother to go
for the Matrox.... how will the GeForce fare for my graphic art
applications?
Are there any computer components I have to worry about besides the
Motherboard concerning compatibility?

 >> Stay informed about: Compatibility 
Back to top
Login to vote
Canid

External


Since: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 4



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:46 am
Post subject: Re: Compatibility [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

How much difference is there in picture quallity, colour and clarity
between the Matrox and the GeForce then? As I understood it, the Matrox
cards had a very good reputation there.


Stephen Howard wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2006 17:01:12 -0700, "Canid" <canids.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >We just bought a 21" Gateway FPD2185W Monitor ... recommended
> >resolution 1680x1050
> >It doesn't get on well with our current Graphics card, so we are
> >looking at getting a new one.
> >I was looking at the Matrox Millennium P650 Video Card, but I am not
> >sure whether it would be compatible with our current system.
> >
> >The Matrox Millennium P650 Video Card has the following minimum system
> >requirements:
> >System: AGP 3.0 compliant
> >128 MB RAM
> >600 MHz CPU
> >Microsoft® Windows® 2000, Windows® XP, or Linux
> >
> >We have an AOpen AX34 Pentium III FC-PGA 133MHz 4x AGP ATX MotherBoard
> >I assume we would have to replace it?
>
> That depends on what OS you're running ( W98, W2000, XP etc ) and on
> what CPU you have installed.
> If you're uncertain as to the CPU, look at the bios screen at startup
> - it should tell you what speed your CPU is.
> Your board is quite old, but capable of supporting PIII cpus up to
> 1Ghz.
>
> >As far as computer knowledge goes, I am a caveman with a silicon club,
> >so go easy on me. Smile
> >
> >We do not really want the added expense of replacing the motherboard,
> >nor the fuss of an internet return should the GPU not work for some
> >other reason (none of the local shops carry Matrox).
> >No one in the house is a gamer, we use the computer for websurfing, and
> >graphic art (Photoshop & an art tablet).
> >The local computer shop suggested the MX4000 as an inexpensive
> >alternative... I assume they meant the GeForce MX4000.
> >As we only have a single monitor setup, is it worth the bother to go
> >for the Matrox.... how will the GeForce fare for my graphic art
> >applications?
>
> The Matrox is a nice bit of kit, but its appeal lies in its dual
> monitor capabilities - and if you don't need or want them then it's a
> bit of a waste.
> The GeForce will be fine for your needs - though check that the output
> socket from your new graphics card matches the input of the monitor.
>
> To be honest, if you're not that savvy with computers I'd recommend
> you stick with your local computer shop rather than scouring the web.
> Might cost you a few quid more but at least you'll stand a better
> chance of getting the right kit - and have somewhere to go if there
> are any problems.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Howard - Woodwind repairs & period restorations
> www.shwoodwind.co.uk
> Emails to: showard{whoisat}shwoodwind{dot}co{dot}uk

 >> Stay informed about: Compatibility 
Back to top
Login to vote
Canid

External


Since: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 4



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:55 am
Post subject: Re: Compatibility [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Main Processor: Pentium III 866MHz
Operating System: Windows XP Professional
 >> Stay informed about: Compatibility 
Back to top
Login to vote
Stephen Howard

External


Since: Apr 27, 2004
Posts: 68



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:36 am
Post subject: Re: Compatibility [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 16 Aug 2006 17:01:12 -0700, "Canid" <canids.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:

>We just bought a 21" Gateway FPD2185W Monitor ... recommended
>resolution 1680x1050
>It doesn't get on well with our current Graphics card, so we are
>looking at getting a new one.
>I was looking at the Matrox Millennium P650 Video Card, but I am not
>sure whether it would be compatible with our current system.
>
>The Matrox Millennium P650 Video Card has the following minimum system
>requirements:
>System: AGP 3.0 compliant
>128 MB RAM
>600 MHz CPU
>Microsoft® Windows® 2000, Windows® XP, or Linux
>
>We have an AOpen AX34 Pentium III FC-PGA 133MHz 4x AGP ATX MotherBoard
>I assume we would have to replace it?

That depends on what OS you're running ( W98, W2000, XP etc ) and on
what CPU you have installed.
If you're uncertain as to the CPU, look at the bios screen at startup
- it should tell you what speed your CPU is.
Your board is quite old, but capable of supporting PIII cpus up to
1Ghz.

>As far as computer knowledge goes, I am a caveman with a silicon club,
>so go easy on me. Smile
>
>We do not really want the added expense of replacing the motherboard,
>nor the fuss of an internet return should the GPU not work for some
>other reason (none of the local shops carry Matrox).
>No one in the house is a gamer, we use the computer for websurfing, and
>graphic art (Photoshop & an art tablet).
>The local computer shop suggested the MX4000 as an inexpensive
>alternative... I assume they meant the GeForce MX4000.
>As we only have a single monitor setup, is it worth the bother to go
>for the Matrox.... how will the GeForce fare for my graphic art
>applications?

The Matrox is a nice bit of kit, but its appeal lies in its dual
monitor capabilities - and if you don't need or want them then it's a
bit of a waste.
The GeForce will be fine for your needs - though check that the output
socket from your new graphics card matches the input of the monitor.

To be honest, if you're not that savvy with computers I'd recommend
you stick with your local computer shop rather than scouring the web.
Might cost you a few quid more but at least you'll stand a better
chance of getting the right kit - and have somewhere to go if there
are any problems.

Regards,



--
Stephen Howard - Woodwind repairs & period restorations
www.shwoodwind.co.uk
Emails to: showard{whoisat}shwoodwind{dot}co{dot}uk
 >> Stay informed about: Compatibility 
Back to top
Login to vote
Canid

External


Since: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 4



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Compatibility [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Thank-you very much. You've been a great help. Smile


Stephen Howard wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2006 04:46:12 -0700, "Canid" <canids RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >How much difference is there in picture quallity, colour and clarity
> >between the Matrox and the GeForce then? As I understood it, the Matrox
> >cards had a very good reputation there.
>
> It used to be that the difference was quite clear - but then the
> competition wasn't all that hot. Different story these days - plus you
> have to factor in improvements in monitor design.
> For example - I have a Matrox G450 running on Philips monitor and an
> NVidia MX440 running on a Compaq monitor..and I get a better picture
> on the Compaq.
>
> You CPU and OS will take the Matrox should you wish to go down that
> path, but you'd be paying a lot for features you wouldn't be using.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Howard - Woodwind repairs & period restorations
> www.shwoodwind.co.uk
> Emails to: showard{whoisat}shwoodwind{dot}co{dot}uk
 >> Stay informed about: Compatibility 
Back to top
Login to vote
Stephen Howard

External


Since: Apr 27, 2004
Posts: 68



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Compatibility [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 17 Aug 2006 04:46:12 -0700, "Canid" <canids.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:

>How much difference is there in picture quallity, colour and clarity
>between the Matrox and the GeForce then? As I understood it, the Matrox
>cards had a very good reputation there.

It used to be that the difference was quite clear - but then the
competition wasn't all that hot. Different story these days - plus you
have to factor in improvements in monitor design.
For example - I have a Matrox G450 running on Philips monitor and an
NVidia MX440 running on a Compaq monitor..and I get a better picture
on the Compaq.

You CPU and OS will take the Matrox should you wish to go down that
path, but you'd be paying a lot for features you wouldn't be using.

Regards,



--
Stephen Howard - Woodwind repairs & period restorations
www.shwoodwind.co.uk
Emails to: showard{whoisat}shwoodwind{dot}co{dot}uk
 >> Stay informed about: Compatibility 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Matrox All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]