"Floyd L. Davidson" <floyd.DeleteThis@apaflo.com> wrote in message
news:87iryqcq5k.fld@barrow.com...
> As to Linux or some other non-Windows system being "not an
> option", it appears to me that is an irrational limitation of
> the consultant, not the customer.
Right. Just the fact that the customer wants XP because they know XP is
enough on it's own (I get paid to do what they want) but once you factor in
the time I would spend swapping over to linux (easily thousand of dollars in
time before I started writing drivers for their dental camera and digital
xray) it would be extremely irrational of me to try.
> Just for starters, if it can be done using an X server I'll be
> amazed to hear that Windows cannot also do it...
All I need to know is that it I'm not missing some really obvious way to do
it, which I think this newsgroup has answered.
> Second, there are a variety of ways to host Windows apps on
> different platforms that might well provide better
> functionality, not to mention security and stability.
This is something that I dislike. If I'm going to run windows apps then I
think it's best to run a windows machine, apple apps on an apple machine
etc. I've seen people running windows apps on different platforms and it
doesn't work that well, besides there being no point to it.
Michael
>> Stay informed about: Dual monitor question