Lightning protection

w_tom wrote:

And still nothing new.

In particular no links to sources that say plug-in sources are NOT
effective.
*Why can't you find any supporting links w_?*

And in particular still no answers:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-in
suppressors?
- Why does the NIST guide says plug-in suppressors are "the easiest
solution"?
- Why does the IEEE Emerald book include plug-in suppressors as an
effective surge protection device?
- Why did Martzloff say in the “surging” paper "One solution.
illustrated in this paper, is the insertion of a properly designed surge
reference equalizer [multiport plug-in surge suppressor].
- IEEE guide pg 42 - how does the plug-in suppressor made the condition
[8,000V] at the distant TV any worse than if the plug-in suppressor was
not present [10,000V].
*Simple questions - why no answers no w_?*

The IEEE and NIST guides both say plug-in suppressors work.

Bizarre claim - plug-in surge suppressors don't work
No sources that say plug-in suppressors do NOT work.
Twists opposing sources to say the opposite of what they really say -
IEEE, Martzloff.
Attempts to discredit opponents.
w_ is still a purveyor of junk science.


--
bud--

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:56:43 -0500, Bud--
<remove.BudNews.TakeThisOut@isp.com> wrote:

>w_tom wrote:
>
>And still nothing new.
>
>In particular no links to sources that say plug-in sources are NOT
>effective.


"They're not effective at preventing all surges."

.... now if you want me to come back and link to this post I
just made, if a "link" is that important...