 |
|
 |
|
Next: What's reasonable RAID 5 performance?
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Nov 24, 2003 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 7:23 am
Post subject: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>storage (more info?)
|
|
|
What happened between Norton Ghost 2003 and Norton Ghost 9.0?
Did Drive Image get merged with NG2003?
I've been playing with the new NG9 and it looks good, but not sure what the
consensus is. Any good?
Lastly, I can't find a way to create backups on CD with the ability to boot
from the backup set of CDs created. Also, there doesn't seem to be a utility
to boot from DOS on a disaster recovery, like NG2003. >> Stay informed about: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 17, 2004 Posts: 52
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:34 am
Post subject: Re: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Pat" <hotpatpar.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FIa%c.12312$Cr5.11780@trndny08...
> What happened between Norton Ghost 2003 and Norton Ghost 9.0?
>
> Did Drive Image get merged with NG2003?
>
> I've been playing with the new NG9 and it looks good, but not sure what
the
> consensus is. Any good?
>
> Lastly, I can't find a way to create backups on CD with the ability to
boot
> from the backup set of CDs created. Also, there doesn't seem to be a
utility
> to boot from DOS on a disaster recovery, like NG2003.
>
Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when they bought
it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable version since the
main functionality tied up with DOS function. Nobody wants the Windows only
version. Even Symantec gave away free Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody wants
it. The question is if any previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 09, 2003 Posts: 136
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ar Q" <ArthurQ283 DeleteThis @hottmail.com> wrote in message
news:tDc%c.9514$w%6.4805@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Pat" <hotpatpar DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:FIa%c.12312$Cr5.11780@trndny08...
> > What happened between Norton Ghost 2003 and Norton Ghost 9.0?
> >
> > Did Drive Image get merged with NG2003?
> >
> > I've been playing with the new NG9 and it looks good, but not sure what
> the
> > consensus is. Any good?
> >
> > Lastly, I can't find a way to create backups on CD with the ability to
> boot
> > from the backup set of CDs created. Also, there doesn't seem to be a
> utility
> > to boot from DOS on a disaster recovery, like NG2003.
> >
>
> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when they
bought
> it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable version since the
> main functionality tied up with DOS function. Nobody wants the Windows
only
> version. Even Symantec gave away free Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody
wants
> it. The question is if any previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.
>
>
Still for sale. DI2002 comes with it.
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/" target="_blank">http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 07, 2004 Posts: 58
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Lil' Dave wrote:
> "Ar Q" <ArthurQ283.RemoveThis@hottmail.com> wrote
>> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when
>> they bought it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable
>> version since the main functionality tied up with DOS function.
>> Nobody wants the Windows only version. Even Symantec gave away free
>> Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody wants it. The question is if any
>> previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.
>>
> Still for sale. DI2002 comes with it.
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/</font" target="_blank">http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/</font</a>>
Try to buy it though, and you get sent to:
Drive ImageT has been discontinued, but all features, and more,
are now available in Norton GhostT 9.0!
--
Mike<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 18, 2003 Posts: 767
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ar Q" wrote:
> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image
> when they bought it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the
> last useable version since the main functionality tied up with
> DOS function. Nobody wants the Windows only version.
> Even Symantec gave away free Drive Image 7 at CompUSA,
> nobody wants it. The question is if any previous DI users turn
> to Ghost, I doubt it.
Drive Image 7 didn't work for me until I installed .NET
Framework as a part of Visual Studio .NET. Then it worked
fine. (I run Windows XP Pro). I was advised by PowerQuest
to use DI 2002 if v.7 didn't work for me, but I could never
get the /IDE=ON switch to turn on DMA, so it ran really
slowly. Right now, I have no complaints about Drive Image 7,
but I don't do any automated backup procedures, so I can't
comment about that.
*TimDaniels*<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 24, 2003 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Norton Ghost 9.0 is advertised to NOW HAVE DRIVE IMAGE TECHNOLOGY. Also, it
allows Windows backups of drive images. I have done an image of one of my
secondary drives and it stayed completely within Windows, no DOS mode. I
have not tried that on my Windows XP drive.
"Mike Redrobe" <mike.TakeThisOut@redrobe.net> wrote in message
news:75f%c.2129$lO1.21961934@news-text.cableinet.net...
> Lil' Dave wrote:
> > "Ar Q" <ArthurQ283.TakeThisOut@hottmail.com> wrote
> >> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when
> >> they bought it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable
> >> version since the main functionality tied up with DOS function.
> >> Nobody wants the Windows only version. Even Symantec gave away free
> >> Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody wants it. The question is if any
> >> previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.
> >>
> > Still for sale. DI2002 comes with it.
<font color=green> > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/</font" target="_blank">http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/</font</a>>
>
> Try to buy it though, and you get sent to:
>
> Drive ImageT has been discontinued, but all features, and more,
> are now available in Norton GhostT 9.0!
>
> --
> Mike
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Restoring from Norton Ghost-Image - Restoring from Norton Ghost-Image Intention: 1. Save a System-Partition to a ghost-image at point A. 2. fool around with the system (add new software etc.) 3. At point B restore system partition from ghost-image Expectations: the restored system is an....
Norton Ghost & QTEC USB Caddy - Hi I am looking at purchasing a QTEC 756C USB2 Hard Drive Caddy, my main reason for purchasing this is so that I can stick a hard drive in it and use Norton Ghost 2003 to create images of other hard drives directly on it. Has anyone tried using Norton...
Norton Ghost 2003 with Maxtor OneTouch USB - Has anyone used norton ghost to create backup images with Maxtor onetouch drives and performed recoverys? Interested to hear of your experiences TIA
Norton Ghost Dump Size Problem - An attempt to backup the contents of my C drive generates an image that is greater in size than the allocated portion of the source. Here are the details: The source on the C drive was 19.9 GB Using Norton Systemworks 2003 Version 6.00 Build 50 The C..
Is there a cheaper or Freeware alternative to Norton Ghost? - I know, I am cheap right, Norton Ghost is under $100.00 but is there a cheaper or Freeware program that can do the same or close to the same as norton ghost, backing up partition to Bootable CD or Bootable DVD? Thank-you kalynuik1@hotmail.spam.com &l... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|