"Patrick Dunford" <patrickdunford DeleteThis @nomail.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b144395ee801b66989764@news.paradise.net.nz...
> > > The P5A is a very old design now dating from about 1997 or so. Could
> > > there be a Bios inherent limitation on this new very large drive.
> >
> > It was the top of the line super-socket-7. It was better than an intel
> > P3-550 if you could find those K6+550 chips. Up until last year, the
XBox
> > was not much faster.
>
> I'd wager that the K6-2 350 with this board is slower than a Pentium II
> 350.
Yep, you are absolutely correct, only the K6 III and the "3+" chips had
that large internal cache and ran at 0 wait state. The few + chips that AMD
made were originally destined for the SBC & PC104 type market and were
engineering sample quantities, very hard to get. The "2+:" was better than
your K6-2 and would be comparable to a celeron rather than a true P2 They
wanted people to move to the K7 and IMHO purposely did not make enough of
them. The + were low power and I picked up 2 of those 3+450 the first time
I saw them on the market. A couple of weeks later, they were all gone and
people were re-selling theirs on ebay. They are still available
occasionally <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.softwareandstuff.com/cpu.html" target="_blank">http://www.softwareandstuff.com/cpu.html</a> but not all P5 boards
will take them. Unaccountably, the later model P5 mombos had problems.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: P5A MB will not recognize WD ATA 80GB drive