 |
|
|
|
Next: DDR Dual Channel Question
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Sep 30, 2004
Posts: 20
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:26 pm
Post subject: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+
Archived from groups: alt>comp>hardware>amd>thunderbird (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| I have a KG7-RAID board and apparently the fastest CPU I can put in it =
is either the AMD SocketA AthlonXP Palomino (0.18 micron process) 2100+ =
or an AMD SocketA AthlonXP Thoroughbred (0.13 micron process) 2000+. I'm =
trying to figure out which is better, the faster clock speed of the =
Palomino or the better core of the Thoroughbred...
|
>> Stay informed about: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jul 24, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:26:42 GMT, "John Eckart" <JEckart DeleteThis @mail.com>
wrote:
>I have a KG7-RAID board and apparently the fastest CPU I can put in it is either the AMD SocketA AthlonXP Palomino (0.18 micron process) 2100+ or an AMD SocketA AthlonXP Thoroughbred (0.13 micron process) 2000+. I'm trying to figure out which is better, the faster clock speed of the Palomino or the better core of the Thoroughbred...
Only real difference is the t-bred is made on a smaller die so it uses
less power and runs cooler at same MHz as the Palomino.
I'd get the t-bred since they are all unlocked and do the wire in the
socket trick to get it up to faster speeds. ;p
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ocinside.de/go_e.html?/html/workshop/pinmod/amd_pinmod.html" target="_blank">http://www.ocinside.de/go_e.html?/html/workshop/pinmod/amd_pinmod.html</a>
Ed<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 30, 2003
Posts: 145
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:17 am
Post subject: Re: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:26:42 +0000, John Eckart wrote:
> I have a KG7-RAID board and apparently the fastest CPU I can put in it
> is either the AMD SocketA AthlonXP Palomino (0.18 micron process) 2100+
> or an AMD SocketA AthlonXP Thoroughbred (0.13 micron process) 2000+. I'm
> trying to figure out which is better, the faster clock speed of the
> Palomino or the better core of the Thoroughbred...
Your information is not correct. The fastest cpu you can put in it is a
Barton core. I'd suggest the 2500+ and then clock it at 12.5x166MHz.
Also any Tbred B core will work fine in it. Many have used the 2400+ in
it. See link below. You might want first hand experiences, Go to
alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit NG, or google for fastest kg7.
--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html" target="_blank">http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I put the Thoroughbred 2200+ in the same board with the latest bios and it
works fine.
"John Eckart" <JEckart RemoveThis @mail.com> schreef in bericht
news:CxVTa.1137$e4.603@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
I have a KG7-RAID board and apparently the fastest CPU I can put in it is
either the AMD SocketA AthlonXP Palomino (0.18 micron process) 2100+ or an
AMD SocketA AthlonXP Thoroughbred (0.13 micron process) 2000+. I'm trying to
figure out which is better, the faster clock speed of the Palomino or the
better core of the Thoroughbred... >> Stay informed about: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 30, 2004
Posts: 20
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 12:42 am
Post subject: Re: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Wes Newell" <w.newell.RemoveThis@SOSverizon.net> wrote in message =
news:pan.2003.07.24.21.26.32.513863@SOSverizon.net...
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:26:42 +0000, John Eckart wrote:
>=20
> > I have a KG7-RAID board and apparently the fastest CPU I can put in =
it
> > is either the AMD SocketA AthlonXP Palomino (0.18 micron process) =
2100+
> > or an AMD SocketA AthlonXP Thoroughbred (0.13 micron process) 2000+. =
I'm
> > trying to figure out which is better, the faster clock speed of the
> > Palomino or the better core of the Thoroughbred...
>=20
> Your information is not correct. The fastest cpu you can put in it is =
a
> Barton core. I'd suggest the 2500+ and then clock it at 12.5x166MHz.
> Also any Tbred B core will work fine in it. Many have used the 2400+ =
in
> it. See link below. You might want first hand experiences, Go to
> alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit NG, or google for fastest kg7.
If I use a Barton 2500+, will it effect the stability of my system? =
Also, will it put any more stress on my memory or PCI cards? And will I =
need to change the CPU voltage?
Sorry for all the questions.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 30, 2003
Posts: 145
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 2:00 am
Post subject: Re: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:42:39 +0000, John Eckart wrote:
> "Wes Newell" <w.newell RemoveThis @SOSverizon.net> wrote in message
> news:pan.2003.07.24.21.26.32.513863@SOSverizon.net...
>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:26:42 +0000, John Eckart wrote:
>>
>> > I have a KG7-RAID board and apparently the fastest CPU I can put in
>> > it is either the AMD SocketA AthlonXP Palomino (0.18 micron process)
>> > 2100+ or an AMD SocketA AthlonXP Thoroughbred (0.13 micron process)
>> > 2000+. I'm trying to figure out which is better, the faster clock
>> > speed of the Palomino or the better core of the Thoroughbred...
>>
>> Your information is not correct. The fastest cpu you can put in it is a
>> Barton core. I'd suggest the 2500+ and then clock it at 12.5x166MHz.
>> Also any Tbred B core will work fine in it. Many have used the 2400+ in
>> it. See link below. You might want first hand experiences, Go to
>> alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit NG, or google for fastest kg7.
>
> If I use a Barton 2500+, will it effect the stability of my system?
Assuming you have a sufficient power supply, and there's nothing wrong
with your system now, no.
> Also, will it put any more stress on my memory or PCI cards?
If you don't change bus speeds it won't.
> And will I need to change the CPU voltage?
>
I don't know what voltage you are using now. The default voltage for the
Barton is 1.65v.
--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html" target="_blank">http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Joined: May 27, 2005
Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 8:54 pm
Post subject: UPDATES [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
Hello, you seem to be very knowledgable about this specific topic. It has been some time since I have kept up on hardware specs in general, since the last processor I bought was a 1GHz Thunderbird (which I am still running right now). I was just wondering if you could tell me what would be a good buy at this point in time, for an upgrade from this processor to put in my KG7-RAID, and what modifications, if any, I would need to make to the board and the processor to get them to work correctly, as I have no idea how one could run a 24x multiplier when the highest rating the BIOS allows is "13 and above." Sorry for being a newb, but I would just like a little peace of mind in knowing exactly what I need to do and if it will work before spending the money to upgrade, as I don't have much for making mistakes. Thank you for your time if you reply to this =)
EDIT: Moved this issue to the home built forum, where it might be more appropriate >> Stay informed about: Palomino 2100+ vs. Thoroughbred 2000+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | Quiet fan recomendations for an single Opteron system - I'm about to build a new workstation based on an ASUS SK8V and an Opteron 146. I want the system to be quiet. Does anyone have a recomendations for fans that are both quiet and also do a decent job of cooling the CPU. How noisy is the stock cooler? Power...
power supply - Helo all I will be buying a Asustek S478 Intel 845PE ATX A L R with a P4 2.66 512KB S478 processor, and having looked at all the Atx cases on Dabs, they range from 180 watt to 400 watt, some are even marked as 12 volt, soory if this sounds like a silly....
Returning XP1800+ (box) for warranty replacement - I was talking to the guy to work out the RMA and during the conversation, he told me that they no longer have these processors. My motherboard (MSI K7T Turbo2) allows only up to the 1800+. So he asked me what I wanted to do. So I told him to just send....
AMD Athlon Mobile XP 1800+/2000+/2200+ running at FSB 200 .. - Hi! I got a Mitac Clone MiNote 7321 Notebook from IPC Archtec running a AthlonM 1200 MHz Processor. I worked through the AMD Technical Specification Docs and the CPU-Support-Tables: http://www.mitacservice.com/visitor_htm/cpu.asp..
new MB, Chip, &.... - If I go out & get myself a new Nforce2 dual channel board & a 2500+ could I make due with the RAM I got now? 2 sticks, 256 meg a piece of Corsair PC2700 CL2 RAM. Good stuff, & I really got no other use for it. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
