In news:469BB2A8.4020902@sala.com sala wrote:
>> In news:469860B2.50507@sala.com sala wrote:
>>> Modem
>>> ... Router #1
>>> ......PC #1a
>>> ......PC #1b
>>> ......PC #1c
>>> ......Router #2 (?)
>>> .........PC #2a
>>> .........PC #2b
>>> .........PC #2c
>>> The PCs #1a/b/c are not regulated (employee own laptops)
>>> and PCs #2a/b/c are regulated with company databases, etc.
>>> I want PCs #2a/b/c to get to the modem and the internet.
>>
>> Hi sala, I don't understand Your setup.
>> What type of modem (analog or DSL) and where installed?
>> What types of routers (do they don't have a modem integrated)?
> The modem is an existing DSL modem which I will probably keep.
Ok, Sala, but WHERE is this modem connected too?
And how are the PC#1 connected to the PC#2?
What belongs to a LAN setup and what to a WLAN setup?
> Router/Switch #1 will be new, probably Gigabit capable and won't need
> integrated modem. I will probably have a separate 802.11b/g wireless
> access point. May want to go with 802.11n in future. The need
> for wireless is not too great right now.
Ok, so this is a candidate for WLAN?
> Router/Switch #2 will be Gigabit capable since some of the systems
> have Gigabit adapters
>>> might have viruses, I might want to restrict them from
>>> accessing PCs #2x. Is this possible with the second router?
WHY do You think they might have virsuses?
>> I'm thinking that because PCs #1x are unregulated and
>> This can not be said without knowledge about Your HW setup.
>> i.e. describe Your network in more details.
>> How do the employee PCs attach to the company network?
>> Are they restricted to only company but not private use?
> Most of the PC #1x are laptops and will have the option of
> using wired or wireless. Most of PC #2x are desktops, but
> some may want to connect their laptops on the #2 side
> of the router/switch.
Ok, but this does not identify the physical connection.
> The system, in the near future have no server, but I want to have
> the ability for the #2x PCs to share data.
This has nothing to do with a server.
> I was just going to make Router/Switch #2 a Switch but I thought
> one can restrict access into the #2 side by using a router. Is
> this not correct? And if it is possible, can it be configured where
> systems on #1 side can access specific #2 computers?
Not sure what You want. But access on LAN would need
specific LAN accesses: i.e. on PC#2 You will specify what other
users of PC#1 will have access via user/password.
> Currently there about 7 computers, but it may expand.
No problem - but only ONE may provide the I-Net connection!
Then You need to setup ICS (internet connecton share) and define
the other PCs that might use this interface.
But do not mix this up with LAN access to another PC.
This is a type of network setup (LAN) and access regulations.
If You don't want that any PC#1 can access any PC#2 data, then
don't allow such an access. And for specifics establish special logons.
This will need special users identified by password.
>>> Can the 2nd router be configured so PCs #1x can access PC #2c but
>>> not the other two?
>> Why do You use routers for PC interconnection?
NO, this has nothing to do with router setup!
It only depends on network (LAN) setup.
But as I said before, without telling Your exact HW setup, there would
be only guessings.
Horst
>> Stay informed about: Two Routers?