"Gavern" <gavernSPAMLESS.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote in message
news:2vioo0F2l0ia7U1@uni-berlin.de...
> Anyone know of anwhere to compare card features.. other than the ATI
> website
> that offers little.
go to <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.tomshardware.com" target="_blank">www.tomshardware.com</a> and search for articles "VGA Charts"
(there are 3 of them) and you'll see old , current and new cards all
compared.
> I have one PC that I am sorting for HTPC that has a Radeon 9100 IGP
> Chipset
> (Sapphire M39 mainboard). I also have a spare 64MB GF4 440 x8 AGP card
> sitting doing nothing that could also be used. Would like to know the
> better
> to use - the AGP GF card or onboard Radeon.
the TV out of a Radeon is better than a GeForce so use that.
plus Nvidia drivers since 41.09 had Macrovision included.
> Have my main PC with a R9000Pro in it and am building a PC for a brother
> and
> can get a 256BM 9550 (not SE) at a decent price. Can't justify a 9600 XT,
> as
> he has never had a PC and want to keep the cost down. Would like to see a
> comparo between the 9550 and my 9000Pro other than the ATI website.... and
> would the 9550 be THAT much better over a 128MB 9200SE that can be had for
> half the price of the 9550...
>
> cheers,
> Gavern
>
the 9550 is slower than the 9500 but has full Dx9 support. (which isnt
really
worth worrying about) It may have more pipelines and bandwidth than
the 9000 to 9200 cards but check the manufacturers website to be sure.
Don't touch the 9200SE - 64bit memory is slow as treacle.
Better yet - look for a 2ndhand Geforce 4 ti on Ebay<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Video card comparisons 
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
