Western Digital 2000

Sorry the system is using Win2000 with SP4

Thanks


"VWWall" <vwall DeleteThis @DEADearthlink.net> wrote in message
news:latkc.140$Hs1.104@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
 > BeeFarmer wrote:
  > > We are trying to setup a western digital 200 gig on a system and can
only
  > > get 128 gigs to show up. We are using a Dell Poweredge 1400 and a
promise
  > > 66 ultra ide card. Any assistance is greatly appreciated. We have
  > > updated the bios on both units.
 >
 > You need an operating system that can accomodate a drive that large as
 > well as a BIOS that uses 48bit LBA. Assuming the BIOS is OK, W2K needs
 > at least SP3, and WinXP needs SP1.
 >
 > If you would define "a system", it would help.
 >
 > Virg Wall
 > --
 >
 > It is vain to do with more
 > what can be done with fewer.
 > William of Occam.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

"BeeFarmer" <OhioBeeFarmer DeleteThis @Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c6to2e$g7rlp$1@ID-66812.news.uni-berlin.de...
 > Sorry the system is using Win2000 with SP4
 >
 >
Registry edit to enable 48 bit LBA support in Win2k:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305098" target="_blank">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305098</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

One thing that is interesting when the computer is booting up the Ultra 66
card shows information that it is 131 and in windows it shows as 131. The
concern I have is that prior to going into the OS the Ultra 66 is showing
131.


"Alien Zord" <rem.alienzord.TakeThisOut@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:c6toqn$g6hti$1@ID-172721.news.uni-berlin.de...
 > "BeeFarmer" <OhioBeeFarmer.TakeThisOut@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
 > news:c6to2e$g7rlp$1@ID-66812.news.uni-berlin.de...
  > > Sorry the system is using Win2000 with SP4
  > >
  > >
 > Registry edit to enable 48 bit LBA support in Win2k:
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305098</font" target="_blank">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305098</font</a>>
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:41:10 -0400, "BeeFarmer"
<OhioBeeFarmer.TakeThisOut@Hotmail.com> wrote:

 >One thing that is interesting when the computer is booting up the Ultra 66
 >card shows information that it is 131 and in windows it shows as 131. The
 >concern I have is that prior to going into the OS the Ultra 66 is showing
 >131.

U need to find out if that card supports 48-bit LBA with a BIOS
upgrade. It's pretty old, though.

MT<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

Thanks Michaels,

I just got off the phone with Promise and they told me that the IDE Ultra 66
doesn't support over 137 because of the
48-bit LBA . Looks like the Ultra 100 Tx2 is the way to go.

Many thanks to all.


"Michael Thomas" <mtNOSPAMMING.DeleteThis@armory.com> wrote in message
news:er159093tpbtuml7kdjohd3jrpct5oveaq@4ax.com...
 > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:41:10 -0400, "BeeFarmer"
 > <OhioBeeFarmer.DeleteThis@Hotmail.com> wrote:
 >
  > >One thing that is interesting when the computer is booting up the Ultra
66
  > >card shows information that it is 131 and in windows it shows as 131.
The
  > >concern I have is that prior to going into the OS the Ultra 66 is showing
  > >131.
 >
 > U need to find out if that card supports 48-bit LBA with a BIOS
 > upgrade. It's pretty old, though.
 >
 > MT<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:13:37 GMT, VWWall <vwall.TakeThisOut@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:

 >BeeFarmer wrote:
  >> We are trying to setup a western digital 200 gig on a system and can only
  >> get 128 gigs to show up. We are using a Dell Poweredge 1400 and a promise
  >> 66 ultra ide card. Any assistance is greatly appreciated. We have
  >> updated the bios on both units.
 >
 >You need an operating system that can accomodate a drive that large as
 >well as a BIOS that uses 48bit LBA. Assuming the BIOS is OK, W2K needs
 >at least SP3, and WinXP needs SP1.
 >
 >If you would define "a system", it would help.

I suppose the distinction needs to be made as to what role this drive
plays. It might be additional storage supplement rather than a swap of
the primary OS drive.

The OS (WinXP SP1 or Win2K SP3) isn't a requirement when using an IDE
controller whose driver supports 48bit LBA. For example, I have a system
with a 160GB drive running on a Promise RAID controller (integrated but
equivalent of a Fasttrack TX2000) under Win98SE. Win98SE's scandisk can't
be used, generates "out of memory" error, and I disabled the DOS scandisk
(renamed the file) to eliminate possibility of it running in DOS after bad
shutdown in addition to disabling it in msdos.sys (AutoScan=0). The drive
is used as storage, not the boot/OS drive... haven't had a chance to test
different "large drive" configurations under Win9x yet. Disk scanning is
done with Norton's Disk Doctor... Might work with McAfee/Network
Associates or other popular disk scanners but I've not tried 'em.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

This drive is for Images and not the main boot drive. We did the registry
change and this didn't make any
changes to the drive size. I have yet to get any info from the manufacture
if this IDE controller has limits.
I will check the WD2000 drive to see if they have jumpers to extend the
setting.


"kony" <spam.TakeThisOut@spam.com> wrote in message
news:j97590p8lpfokuni1u2sngtar3p147otsr@4ax.com...
 > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:13:37 GMT, VWWall <vwall.TakeThisOut@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
 >
  > >BeeFarmer wrote:
   > >> We are trying to setup a western digital 200 gig on a system and can
only
   > >> get 128 gigs to show up. We are using a Dell Poweredge 1400 and a
promise
   > >> 66 ultra ide card. Any assistance is greatly appreciated. We have
   > >> updated the bios on both units.
  > >
  > >You need an operating system that can accomodate a drive that large as
  > >well as a BIOS that uses 48bit LBA. Assuming the BIOS is OK, W2K needs
  > >at least SP3, and WinXP needs SP1.
  > >
  > >If you would define "a system", it would help.
 >
 > I suppose the distinction needs to be made as to what role this drive
 > plays. It might be additional storage supplement rather than a swap of
 > the primary OS drive.
 >
 > The OS (WinXP SP1 or Win2K SP3) isn't a requirement when using an IDE
 > controller whose driver supports 48bit LBA. For example, I have a system
 > with a 160GB drive running on a Promise RAID controller (integrated but
 > equivalent of a Fasttrack TX2000) under Win98SE. Win98SE's scandisk can't
 > be used, generates "out of memory" error, and I disabled the DOS scandisk
 > (renamed the file) to eliminate possibility of it running in DOS after bad
 > shutdown in addition to disabling it in msdos.sys (AutoScan=0). The drive
 > is used as storage, not the boot/OS drive... haven't had a chance to test
 > different "large drive" configurations under Win9x yet. Disk scanning is
 > done with Norton's Disk Doctor... Might work with McAfee/Network
 > Associates or other popular disk scanners but I've not tried 'em.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:41:10 -0400, "BeeFarmer"
<OhioBeeFarmer DeleteThis @Hotmail.com> wrote:

 >One thing that is interesting when the computer is booting up the Ultra 66
 >card shows information that it is 131 and in windows it shows as 131. The
 >concern I have is that prior to going into the OS the Ultra 66 is showing
 >131.

Then you've isolated this a bit... Check whether another/newer bios is
available for IDE card and check the drive's capacity jumper(s).<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000 

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:18:52 -0400, "BeeFarmer"
<OhioBeeFarmer RemoveThis @Hotmail.com> wrote:

 >This drive is for Images and not the main boot drive. We did the registry
 >change and this didn't make any
 >changes to the drive size. I have yet to get any info from the manufacture
 >if this IDE controller has limits.
 >I will check the WD2000 drive to see if they have jumpers to extend the
 >setting.

AFAIK, that controller will not support that large of a drive.

You need to purchase a new controller.


Have a nice week...

Trent©

Follow Joan Rivers' example --- get pre-embalmed!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Western Digital 2000