 |
|
|
|
Next: FlexStand your Webcam
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:33 am
Post subject: My ideal camera (based on Canon)
Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>dcameras, others (more info?)
|
|
|
I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being marketed
as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only have
found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value would
drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
Another sadly missing feature from todays' cameras is proper wide angle
lenses. By that I mean 28mm equivalent. As far as I know only 3 cameras have
it. 2 are Olympus WZ cameras, and are both big, bulky and expensive (and a
nasty menu system), the other is the soon to be released Canon S60. I know I
could get a wide angle adapter for a Canon, but they add to the cost of the
camera, and it's something else to carry around. It is also bound to affect
the quality of the pictures to some extent.
As far as I can tell, the S60 is let down by no flip out screen, and small
Li-ion battery (1000MAh I believe, when a NiMH AA can go up to 2300mAh)
So, camera manufacturers, here's my wishlist. If there's a camera out there
that has these features already, and isn't in the digiSLR price range, let
me know
Canon A60-80 styling - comfortable grip, fairly small, good looking
28 to70+mm zoom equivalent (don't need >70mm, but it's a bonus)
flip/tilt LCD screen
Consumer priced
Powered by AA NiMH
Compact Flash (cheap) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Aug 19, 2003
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:33 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Nightdrive" <nightdrive.TakeThisOut@supanet.com> wrote in message
news:40cff794$0$17760$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being marketed
> as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only have
> found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
> I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value would
> drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
Well that was silly, wasn't it? Were you not happy with the pics from the
A70? I hate to burst your bubble, but every digicam that comes out is going
to be replaced by something else eventually. Which means that no matter
what you buy, the value will drop. Maybe it's better not to buy a digicam
at all, then you don't have to worry about things like that.
Mark<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:42 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Add Nikon 5400. (bit smaller than Olympus 5060)
Add Panasonic LC-1. (bit cheaper than Leica Digilux 2).
Steve
"Nightdrive" <nightdrive.DeleteThis@supanet.com> wrote in message
news:40cff794$0$17760$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being marketed
> as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only have
> found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
> I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value would
> drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
> Another sadly missing feature from todays' cameras is proper wide angle
> lenses. By that I mean 28mm equivalent. As far as I know only 3 cameras
have
> it. 2 are Olympus WZ cameras, and are both big, bulky and expensive (and a
> nasty menu system), the other is the soon to be released Canon S60. I know
I
> could get a wide angle adapter for a Canon, but they add to the cost of
the
> camera, and it's something else to carry around. It is also bound to
affect
> the quality of the pictures to some extent.
>
> As far as I can tell, the S60 is let down by no flip out screen, and small
> Li-ion battery (1000MAh I believe, when a NiMH AA can go up to 2300mAh)
>
> So, camera manufacturers, here's my wishlist. If there's a camera out
there
> that has these features already, and isn't in the digiSLR price range, let
> me know
>
> Canon A60-80 styling - comfortable grip, fairly small, good looking
> 28 to70+mm zoom equivalent (don't need >70mm, but it's a bonus)
> flip/tilt LCD screen
> Consumer priced
> Powered by AA NiMH
> Compact Flash (cheap)
>
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 48
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:46 pm
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Nightdrive" <nightdrive RemoveThis @supanet.com> wrote in message
news:40cff794$0$17760$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being marketed
> as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only have
> found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
> I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value would
> drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
> Another sadly missing feature from todays' cameras is proper wide angle
> lenses. By that I mean 28mm equivalent. As far as I know only 3 cameras
have
> it. 2 are Olympus WZ cameras, and are both big, bulky and expensive (and a
> nasty menu system), the other is the soon to be released Canon S60. I know
I
> could get a wide angle adapter for a Canon, but they add to the cost of
the
> camera, and it's something else to carry around. It is also bound to
affect
> the quality of the pictures to some extent.
>
> As far as I can tell, the S60 is let down by no flip out screen, and small
> Li-ion battery (1000MAh I believe, when a NiMH AA can go up to 2300mAh)
>
> So, camera manufacturers, here's my wishlist. If there's a camera out
there
> that has these features already, and isn't in the digiSLR price range, let
> me know
>
> Canon A60-80 styling - comfortable grip, fairly small, good looking
> 28 to70+mm zoom equivalent (don't need >70mm, but it's a bonus)
> flip/tilt LCD screen
> Consumer priced
> Powered by AA NiMH
> Compact Flash (cheap)
>
>
You took the specs right out of my brian!
Eddie<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:14 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Mark B." <mbohntrash54.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:46OdndWIa4fbg03dRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
> "Nightdrive" <nightdrive.DeleteThis@supanet.com> wrote in message
> news:40cff794$0$17760$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> > I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being
marketed
> > as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only
have
> > found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
> > I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value
would
> > drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
>
>
> Well that was silly, wasn't it? Were you not happy with the pics from the
> A70? I hate to burst your bubble, but every digicam that comes out is
going
> to be replaced by something else eventually. Which means that no matter
> what you buy, the value will drop. Maybe it's better not to buy a digicam
> at all, then you don't have to worry about things like that.
>
>
> Mark
>
>
I buy after the price settles down, and sell before the price takes a
nosedive. In the meantime I expect a steady fall in value. It means I can be
always taking advantage of new features and specifications on newer models,
with minimum loss of investment. I can stand to be without a digital camera
for a couple of months.
Try to read the post in it's entirity before coming up with pointless
remarks.
In the meantime, if you have a dream camera spec, or would like to flame my
choice of features, be my guest.
Greg<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:41 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Cheers for the info.
Panasonic is way out of my price range, but does look very nice.
Nikon looks promising. It has all features I need, except it has quite low
capacity Li-Ion battery. Reading reviews at dpreview.com seems to review
some persitent problems with low light focusing, poor performance saving to
disk, and other problems. Reviews of the Canon A80 aer a lot more positive.
The canon is also almost half the price, but alas, no 28mm wide angle.
I may end up waiting until a better range of wide angle cameras become
available.
Greg
"Steve Almond" <stepheninlancs RemoveThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:2jabt0Fv6a4sU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Add Nikon 5400. (bit smaller than Olympus 5060)
> Add Panasonic LC-1. (bit cheaper than Leica Digilux 2).
>
>
> Steve
>
> "Nightdrive" <nightdrive RemoveThis @supanet.com> wrote in message
> news:40cff794$0$17760$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> > I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being
marketed
> > as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only
have
> > found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
> > I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value
would
> > drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
> > Another sadly missing feature from todays' cameras is proper wide angle
> > lenses. By that I mean 28mm equivalent. As far as I know only 3 cameras
> have
> > it. 2 are Olympus WZ cameras, and are both big, bulky and expensive (and
a
> > nasty menu system), the other is the soon to be released Canon S60. I
know
> I
> > could get a wide angle adapter for a Canon, but they add to the cost of
> the
> > camera, and it's something else to carry around. It is also bound to
> affect
> > the quality of the pictures to some extent.
> >
> > As far as I can tell, the S60 is let down by no flip out screen, and
small
> > Li-ion battery (1000MAh I believe, when a NiMH AA can go up to 2300mAh)
> >
> > So, camera manufacturers, here's my wishlist. If there's a camera out
> there
> > that has these features already, and isn't in the digiSLR price range,
let
> > me know
> >
> > Canon A60-80 styling - comfortable grip, fairly small, good looking
> > 28 to70+mm zoom equivalent (don't need >70mm, but it's a bonus)
> > flip/tilt LCD screen
> > Consumer priced
> > Powered by AA NiMH
> > Compact Flash (cheap)
> >
> >
> >
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 02, 2004
Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:41 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I have been waiting for wider than 35mm (equiv) for 5 years now. It ain't
gonna' happen unless you go fixed lens with about 28mm (equiv). Go figure?
"Nightdrive" <nightdrive DeleteThis @supanet.com> wrote in message
news:40d0cc67$0$17757$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> Cheers for the info.
> Panasonic is way out of my price range, but does look very nice.
> Nikon looks promising. It has all features I need, except it has quite low
> capacity Li-Ion battery. Reading reviews at dpreview.com seems to review
> some persitent problems with low light focusing, poor performance saving
to
> disk, and other problems. Reviews of the Canon A80 aer a lot more
positive.
> The canon is also almost half the price, but alas, no 28mm wide angle.
> I may end up waiting until a better range of wide angle cameras become
> available.
>
> Greg
>
>
> "Steve Almond" <stepheninlancs DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:2jabt0Fv6a4sU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > Add Nikon 5400. (bit smaller than Olympus 5060)
> > Add Panasonic LC-1. (bit cheaper than Leica Digilux 2).
> >
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > "Nightdrive" <nightdrive DeleteThis @supanet.com> wrote in message
> > news:40cff794$0$17760$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> > > I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being
> marketed
> > > as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only
> have
> > > found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
> > > I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value
> would
> > > drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
> > > Another sadly missing feature from todays' cameras is proper wide
angle
> > > lenses. By that I mean 28mm equivalent. As far as I know only 3
cameras
> > have
> > > it. 2 are Olympus WZ cameras, and are both big, bulky and expensive
(and
> a
> > > nasty menu system), the other is the soon to be released Canon S60. I
> know
> > I
> > > could get a wide angle adapter for a Canon, but they add to the cost
of
> > the
> > > camera, and it's something else to carry around. It is also bound to
> > affect
> > > the quality of the pictures to some extent.
> > >
> > > As far as I can tell, the S60 is let down by no flip out screen, and
> small
> > > Li-ion battery (1000MAh I believe, when a NiMH AA can go up to
2300mAh)
> > >
> > > So, camera manufacturers, here's my wishlist. If there's a camera out
> > there
> > > that has these features already, and isn't in the digiSLR price range,
> let
> > > me know
> > >
> > > Canon A60-80 styling - comfortable grip, fairly small, good looking
> > > 28 to70+mm zoom equivalent (don't need >70mm, but it's a bonus)
> > > flip/tilt LCD screen
> > > Consumer priced
> > > Powered by AA NiMH
> > > Compact Flash (cheap)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 48
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 9:10 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Mark B." <mbohntrash54.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:46OdndWIa4fbg03dRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
> "Nightdrive" <nightdrive.DeleteThis@supanet.com> wrote in message
> news:40cff794$0$17760$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> > I recently owned a Canon A70. Very pleased with it. Despite being
marketed
> > as more point and shoot, it has the professional features you'd only
have
> > found on a professional SLR a few years ago.
> > I sold it due it's being replaced by the A75, (therefore it's value
would
> > drop rapidly), and the appearance of the A80 with fold out screen.
>
>
> Well that was silly, wasn't it? Were you not happy with the pics from the
> A70? I hate to burst your bubble, but every digicam that comes out is
going
> to be replaced by something else eventually. Which means that no matter
> what you buy, the value will drop. Maybe it's better not to buy a digicam
> at all, then you don't have to worry about things like that.
>
>
> Mark
>
Yes, that's right. And we won't bother buying computers etc either. But I
won one at work, where I was charged with buying a modest digicam. I had
opted for the A70, and waited for the grinding wheels of gvt beaurocracy to
move. By the time they did, I was able to get the A75, which was an
improvement on the A70. Had I waited just a little longer, then the A80
would have come in budget...heck, if I wait long enough, I could get a
Haselblad with digital back!
Eddie<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:31 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Gymmy Bob" <nospamming.DeleteThis@bite.me> wrote in message
news:8tidncZi46c9m0zd4p2dnA@golden.net...
> I have been waiting for wider than 35mm (equiv) for 5 years now. It ain't
> gonna' happen unless you go fixed lens with about 28mm (equiv). Go figure?
>
I'm not sure I understand this. What about:
Minolta Dimage A1 and A2?
Nikon 5400?
Olympus 5060?
Canon S60?
What is it that disqualifies these cameras?
Steve<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 02, 2004
Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 8:35 pm
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Most of them are monsters in size and weight (couldn't be bothered to
strengthen my neck again) and the Canon snuck in since I have given up and
purchased the last time (didn't see it before)
"Steve Almond" <stepheninlancs DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:2jcvmtFuaa9fU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Gymmy Bob" <nospamming DeleteThis @bite.me> wrote in message
> news:8tidncZi46c9m0zd4p2dnA@golden.net...
> > I have been waiting for wider than 35mm (equiv) for 5 years now. It
ain't
> > gonna' happen unless you go fixed lens with about 28mm (equiv). Go
figure?
> >
>
> I'm not sure I understand this. What about:
>
> Minolta Dimage A1 and A2?
> Nikon 5400?
> Olympus 5060?
> Canon S60?
>
> What is it that disqualifies these cameras?
>
> Steve
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:29 am
Post subject: Re: My ideal camera (based on Canon) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I agree about the size. The Canon is the only hope!
(The Olympus has just had a great review in a UK magazine)
Steve
"Gymmy Bob" <nospamming.RemoveThis@bite.me> wrote in message
news:cbOdnV8a4Nbek0_dRVn-ug@golden.net...
> Most of them are monsters in size and weight (couldn't be bothered to
> strengthen my neck again) and the Canon snuck in since I have given up and
> purchased the last time (didn't see it before)
>
> "Steve Almond" <stepheninlancs.RemoveThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:2jcvmtFuaa9fU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "Gymmy Bob" <nospamming.RemoveThis@bite.me> wrote in message
> > news:8tidncZi46c9m0zd4p2dnA@golden.net...
> > > I have been waiting for wider than 35mm (equiv) for 5 years now. It
> ain't
> > > gonna' happen unless you go fixed lens with about 28mm (equiv). Go
> figure?
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand this. What about:
> >
> > Minolta Dimage A1 and A2?
> > Nikon 5400?
> > Olympus 5060?
> > Canon S60?
> >
> > What is it that disqualifies these cameras?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: My ideal camera (based on Canon) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | Canon Camera AF 35 ML (circa 1981) - Does anyone out there have an Owner's Manual for this Camera? If so can you tell me the purpose of the window with red and white stripes on the back of the camera? --Colin
FS: CB-2LT Canon digital camera / camcorder battery charge.. - Brand new battery charger for Canon standard batteries CB-2LT. Works with my Canon S30 camera, and apparently also with camcorders. Bought this one to replace my old one that I thought I lost. Vancouver, BC -- contact me by email or phone 778-773-8213...
Canon A40 or A60 - Hi NG, I'm looking at buying my first digital camera and I've found the following : - Canon Powershot A40 - £99.99 (inc VAT) or Canon Powershot A60 - £155.01 (inc VAT) The Question is, is the A60 really worth the £55 extra for a current....
hp 945 or canon s50 - I'm thinking of getting either a hp 945 or canon s50. Does anybody know which is the better model. I checked out the hp and it looks like an SLR the viewfinder is seprate from the lens. Personally I don't like HP products, but if it's better then the....
Canon S50 vs S45 - Does anyone have experience/opinions on the relative merits of these two cameras? I'd like to know if there is any image quality improvement by going for the higher 5MP offered by the S50, or whether it just makes the image noisier. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
