Welcome to PCForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

nvidia vs ati for LCD.

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> ATI RSS
Next:  How hot should a 9800 pro run?  
Author Message
Gregory Kleverlaan

External


Since: Feb 04, 2004
Posts: 10



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 8:46 pm
Post subject: nvidia vs ati for LCD.
Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>videocards>ati (more info?)

old Nvidia geforce 2 mx/400 vs new ATI Radeon 9xxx

Iam using an old nvidia geforce 2 video card and an Samsung 172N. Analog
15pin connector.

At the moment the video/graphics/text quality is poor on the lcd
Running at 1280x1024 60hertz to get the best out of it. But its still not
very good. I've tried calibrating the monitor and all the usual settings,
but its still not the best.

I was wondering if I upgrade to a better video card like a 9200pro or 9600
SE or similar, would it improve the text/graphics quality of the monitor?

Also would it be better to use the DVI (dVI adapter -> vga 15 converter)
connector for better performance / quality?

What would be the best way to get maximum quality out of the monitor?

 >> Stay informed about: nvidia vs ati for LCD. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Asestar1

External


Since: May 17, 2004
Posts: 211



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 8:46 pm
Post subject: Re: nvidia vs ati for LCD. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Do your monitor has a DVI input? If so, then using a 9600/9200 would give
you much better quality.
Otherwise there will not be as big difference. I upgraded from GF2 Pro, to
Radeon8500LE, and the difference in text quality was noticable. I am however
using a CRT monitor. There was almost no difference when upgraded from 8500
to 9600SE.



"Gregory Kleverlaan" <g12345567 RemoveThis @nospam.yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:c6vkk0$gj8ov$1@ID-170116.news.uni-berlin.de...
 > old Nvidia geforce 2 mx/400 vs new ATI Radeon 9xxx
 >
 > Iam using an old nvidia geforce 2 video card and an Samsung 172N. Analog
 > 15pin connector.
 >
 > At the moment the video/graphics/text quality is poor on the lcd
 > Running at 1280x1024 60hertz to get the best out of it. But its still not
 > very good. I've tried calibrating the monitor and all the usual settings,
 > but its still not the best.
 >
 > I was wondering if I upgrade to a better video card like a 9200pro or 9600
 > SE or similar, would it improve the text/graphics quality of the monitor?
 >
 > Also would it be better to use the DVI (dVI adapter -> vga 15 converter)
 > connector for better performance / quality?
 >
 > What would be the best way to get maximum quality out of the monitor?
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: nvidia vs ati for LCD. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Darthy

External


Since: Aug 26, 2004
Posts: 494



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 6:44 am
Post subject: Re: nvidia vs ati for LCD. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sat, 1 May 2004 17:46:04 +1000, "Gregory Kleverlaan"
<g12345567.TakeThisOut@nospam.yahoo.com.au> wrote:

 >old Nvidia geforce 2 mx/400 vs new ATI Radeon 9xxx
 >
 >Iam using an old nvidia geforce 2 video card and an Samsung 172N. Analog
 >15pin connector.
 >
 >At the moment the video/graphics/text quality is poor on the lcd
 >Running at 1280x1024 60hertz to get the best out of it. But its still not
 >very good. I've tried calibrating the monitor and all the usual settings,
 >but its still not the best.
 >
 >I was wondering if I upgrade to a better video card like a 9200pro or 9600
 >SE or similar, would it improve the text/graphics quality of the monitor?
 >
 >Also would it be better to use the DVI (dVI adapter -> vga 15 converter)
 >connector for better performance / quality?
 >
 >What would be the best way to get maximum quality out of the monitor?

There are DVI > VGA converters... dont know about the other way, but
if so - it wouldn't do anything to help the picture.

But when it comes to GF2 cards, running anything above 1280x1024 and
highe tends to blur.... but also, LCDs of 18" and larger (1280x1024)
should be DVI - it makes a BIG difference!!

Remember: In the USA - it is illegal to draw or write about Heir Bush in a negative way. The police or SS are called.

15yr old boy in Washington was disciplined for drawing such images.

God bless the land of the free. Where you can burn the Constitution... Ashcroft does it every day.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: nvidia vs ati for LCD. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jim in Canada1

External


Since: Apr 24, 2004
Posts: 12



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 8:06 am
Post subject: Re: nvidia vs ati for LCD. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

If using XP, be sure to visit the MS Cleartype tuner web site to calibrate
your settings.
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/1.htm?fname=%20&fsize=" target="_blank">http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/1.htm?fname=%20&fsize=</a>

Jim
"Gregory Kleverlaan" <g12345567.RemoveThis@nospam.yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:c6vkk0$gj8ov$1@ID-170116.news.uni-berlin.de...
 > old Nvidia geforce 2 mx/400 vs new ATI Radeon 9xxx
 >
 > Iam using an old nvidia geforce 2 video card and an Samsung 172N. Analog
 > 15pin connector.
 >
 > At the moment the video/graphics/text quality is poor on the lcd
 > Running at 1280x1024 60hertz to get the best out of it. But its still not
 > very good. I've tried calibrating the monitor and all the usual settings,
 > but its still not the best.
 >
 > I was wondering if I upgrade to a better video card like a 9200pro or 9600
 > SE or similar, would it improve the text/graphics quality of the monitor?
 >
 > Also would it be better to use the DVI (dVI adapter -> vga 15 converter)
 > connector for better performance / quality?
 >
 > What would be the best way to get maximum quality out of the monitor?
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: nvidia vs ati for LCD. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Anyone went from nVidia to ATI? - Hi, I had an nVidia (GeForce2 GTS), now I have an ATI card (9700 Pro), and I am thinking about going back to nVidia (6800GT). Is there anyone here that went to nVidia from ATI and regretted it? If so, what was the old and the new cards, and what were...

FutureMark and NVidia in bed - "http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews/review.php?dXJsX3Jldmlld19JRD04NzgmdXJ sX3BhZ2U9OQ==" Hmmm.... FutureMark must have been studying little Kerry's chameleon like position changing abilities and decided it was a positive thing! -- Tony Di...

256MB DDR NVIDIA GeForceFX(TM) 5500 or.. - I'm building a Pc on Hp's web site, and have choice between a 256MB DDR NVIDIA GeForceFX 5500 or 256MB DDR ATI Radeon 9800. I know the 9800 is most likely a better card, but the price difference is $120, There is a 128MB DDR 5200XT for $ 60 less the..

Funny Nvidia parody - http://gaming.multiplay.co.uk/?p=/ftpfiles.php%3Fpid%3D20%26fid%3D3406 This is a short video by Nvidia marketing about how loud and powerful some of the FX cards can be. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system..

ATI All In Wonder 9000 Pro Versus Nvidia Geforce 4 MX 440 - How do this two cards match up? I have the opportunity to by an all in wonder 9000 pro for $50 America in the box. Is the Nvidia fast or not. -- Andrew C. Cooper www.wordforlife.com/cmhm
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> ATI All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]