radeon comparison

Go to <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.xbitlabs.com" target="_blank">www.xbitlabs.com</a> for head-to-head comparisons between all Radeon
models.

"chris" <someone RemoveThis @here.com> wrote in message
news:40438519$1@funnel.arach.net.au...
 > does anyone know the differance between the ati radeon 9200se and the
9600se
 > in performance - the ati website is really helpfull in comparisons NOT
 >
 > any advise is apreciated - i am mainly interested in 2d graphics
performance
 >
 > TIA
 >
 > chris
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison 

In the 9600SE the processor and the memory are clocked faster than on the
9200SE.

--
DaveW



"chris" <someone.DeleteThis@here.com> wrote in message
news:40438519$1@funnel.arach.net.au...
 > does anyone know the differance between the ati radeon 9200se and the
9600se
 > in performance - the ati website is really helpfull in comparisons NOT
 >
 > any advise is apreciated - i am mainly interested in 2d graphics
performance
 >
 > TIA
 >
 > chris
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison 

i use photoshop quite a bit and have a 9200 card and find sometimes it is a
bit slown when applying styles etc to large objects , by the way i use 2
monitors connected to the card and span my desktop.


"Ben Pope" <spam.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2010g$1mmr0j$1@ID-191149.news.uni-berlin.de...
 > chris wrote:
  > > does anyone know the differance between the ati radeon 9200se and the
  > > 9600se in performance - the ati website is really helpfull in
comparisons
  > > NOT
  > >
  > > any advise is apreciated - i am mainly interested in 2d graphics
  > > performance
 >
 > In terms of 2D, I doubt you'd notice the difference.
 >
 > The difference is likely to be proportional to the GPU core speed.
 >
 > Any new card will handle 2D satisfactorily, is there anything specific you
 > want it to be able to do?
 >
 > Ben
 > --
<font color=purple> > A7N8X FAQ: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</font" target="_blank">www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</font</a>>
 > Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
 > I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison 

chris wrote:
 > i use photoshop quite a bit and have a 9200 card and find sometimes
 > it is a bit slown when applying styles etc to large objects , by the
 > way i use 2 monitors connected to the card and span my desktop.

Erm, I think you're talking about CPU intensive operations, not GPU
intensive operations. 2D graphic performance has been adequate for any
purpose for the last.. 6 years? Applying a style, filter or whatever
requires CPU operation. So.. I'd look into that first. Could you specify
your system here?

Thomas<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison 

chris wrote:
 > i use photoshop quite a bit and have a 9200 card and find sometimes
 > it is a bit slown when applying styles etc to large objects , by the
 > way i use 2 monitors connected to the card and span my desktop.
 >

Thats a function of your processor and memory, not the graphics card.

S<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison 

system is

1.5gig ddr 400 ram
athlon 2600 cpu
gigabyte ga-7vaxp mainboard

2x 80gb hdd 7200 8 meg buffer
1x 20 GB hdd 7200





"Thomas" <thomas_ RemoveThis @lycos.nl> wrote in message
news:OxM0c.728869$_x2.1595605@zonnet-reader-1...
 > chris wrote:
  > > i use photoshop quite a bit and have a 9200 card and find sometimes
  > > it is a bit slown when applying styles etc to large objects , by the
  > > way i use 2 monitors connected to the card and span my desktop.
 >
 > Erm, I think you're talking about CPU intensive operations, not GPU
 > intensive operations. 2D graphic performance has been adequate for any
 > purpose for the last.. 6 years? Applying a style, filter or whatever
 > requires CPU operation. So.. I'd look into that first. Could you specify
 > your system here?
 >
 > Thomas
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison 

chris wrote:
   >>> i use photoshop quite a bit and have a 9200 card and find sometimes
   >>> it is a bit slown when applying styles etc to large objects , by the
   >>> way i use 2 monitors connected to the card and span my desktop.
  >>
  >> Erm, I think you're talking about CPU intensive operations, not GPU
  >> intensive operations. 2D graphic performance has been adequate for
  >> any purpose for the last.. 6 years? Applying a style, filter or
  >> whatever requires CPU operation. So.. I'd look into that first.
  >> Could you specify your system here?

 > system is
 > 1.5gig ddr 400 ram
 > athlon 2600 cpu
 > gigabyte ga-7vaxp mainboard
 > 2x 80gb hdd 7200 8 meg buffer
 > 1x 20 GB hdd 7200

That should be enough then
Well, I think it just wont go faster, but hmm, I'm not quite the photoshop
expert here I think the vid card wont help a bit, as 2D speed is by and
large fast enough to put anything on the screen instantly.

Thomas<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison 

2D both will be fine, gaming both will be bad.

"chris" <someone.TakeThisOut@here.com> wrote in message
news:40438519$1@funnel.arach.net.au...
 > does anyone know the differance between the ati radeon 9200se and the
9600se
 > in performance - the ati website is really helpfull in comparisons NOT
 >
 > any advise is apreciated - i am mainly interested in 2d graphics
performance
 >
 > TIA
 >
 > chris
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: radeon comparison