What is my real CPU?

What does the BIOS report?

Pet Parker wrote:
>
> "Truongs" <sitruong.TakeThisOut@chorus.net> wrote in message
> news:MAN7i.35146$G23.9048@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
> > Hi All.
> >
> > I just bought a Sony Vaio Notebook VGN-FE880E. Under System my CPU is
> > shown
> > as Intel Core 2 CPU T5500 @1.66 GHz. But, under Device Manager, it's shown
> > as Intel Core 2 CPU T7600 @2.33 GHz (twice). Which one is my correct CPU?
> > Your assistance will be very much appreciated.
> >
> >
>
> what was it described as by the seller........

--
Mike Walsh
West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

Hi,

Thanks for looking into my question. I downloaded CPU-Z as recommended by
Paul and it showed Intel Core 2 Dual T5500 @1.66 GHz with 2 MB of L2 Cache
as advertised by Sony. But I'm curious why the Device Manager showed
different version.

Regards.


"Mike Walsh" <spamscks.TakeThisOut@netrox.net> wrote in message
news:46602C07.1D5FC67E@netrox.net...
:
: What does the BIOS report?
:
: Pet Parker wrote:
: >
: > "Truongs" <sitruong.TakeThisOut@chorus.net> wrote in message
: > news:MAN7i.35146$G23.9048@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
: > > Hi All.
: > >
: > > I just bought a Sony Vaio Notebook VGN-FE880E. Under System my CPU is
: > > shown
: > > as Intel Core 2 CPU T5500 @1.66 GHz. But, under Device Manager, it's
shown
: > > as Intel Core 2 CPU T7600 @2.33 GHz (twice). Which one is my correct
CPU?
: > > Your assistance will be very much appreciated.
: > >
: > >
: >
: > what was it described as by the seller........
:
: --
: Mike Walsh
: West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:28:30 -0400, "MF"
<cheatsandlies.RemoveThis@spammersbl0w.com> wrote:

>Yeah, but think of it like this.
>>

There's no "think of it like this". The proper form was
explained so at this point you're just inable to learn
anything. There is nothing you could post that changes
this.
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

"MF" wrote:
> Yeah, but think of it like this. If you bottom post, someone cruising
> through the thread has to read the same drivel over and over before
> reaching your well thought out opinion.

As a rule of thumb, those who are too lazy to snip content which is not
relevent to what they are replying to are not worth the time to read.
Hence, after a screen or two of "the same drivel", it is on to the next
message (in most cases).

Jon
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

inable.............hmmmm

what about spelling/grammar are you gonna rep us on that to.


"kony" <spam.TakeThisOut@spam.com> wrote in message
news:b8s46318ls6fr0059fdak6d1eecubflut1@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:28:30 -0400, "MF"
> <cheatsandlies.TakeThisOut@spammersbl0w.com> wrote:
>
>>Yeah, but think of it like this.
>>>
>
> There's no "think of it like this". The proper form was
> explained so at this point you're just inable to learn
> anything. There is nothing you could post that changes
> this.
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:14:33 +0100, "Pet Parker"
<998.TakeThisOut@128btinternet.com> wrote:

>inable.............hmmmm
>
>what about spelling/grammar are you gonna rep us on that to.
>
>


If you can't discriminate the difference between occasional
spelling or typos and deliberate choices in posting style,
perhaps you'd be better off refraining from comment?
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

whi...........opps why.


"kony" <spam.RemoveThis@spam.com> wrote in message
news:jrd563pjp30milakd7rubic2dodgsl3oto@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:14:33 +0100, "Pet Parker"
> <998.RemoveThis@128btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>>inable.............hmmmm
>>
>>what about spelling/grammar are you gonna rep us on that to.
>>
>>
>
>
> If you can't discriminate the difference between occasional
> spelling or typos and deliberate choices in posting style,
> perhaps you'd be better off refraining from comment?
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:46633E0A.4096126@yahoo.com...
> That is no excuse.


ooooooohhhhhhhooooooohhahahahahahahahahahahahah.
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

"kony" <spam RemoveThis @spam.com> wrote in message
news:b8s46318ls6fr0059fdak6d1eecubflut1@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:28:30 -0400, "MF"
> <cheatsandlies RemoveThis @spammersbl0w.com> wrote:
>
>>Yeah, but think of it like this.
>>>
>
> There's no "think of it like this". The proper form was
> explained so at this point you're just inable to learn
> anything. There is nothing you could post that changes
> this.

Well, what I said in the post that _you improperly snipped_ was a joke.

But, dolt, there is _always_ "think of it like this."

In every instance in every situation in human history. Do you in your
ultimate triviality think that Usenet transcends that? Do you think that
your stupid adolescent strictures transcend that?

On a lighter note, anyone that can't handle a mix of bottom/inline/top
posting has very serious problems of anal retentiveness. What we might in
ordinary language call obsessive-compulsive rigidity. And someone who
corrects everyone who top posts, and someone who usually reinforces that
correction should clearly seek at least semi-professional help. You might
start by saying "I AM A USENET MAVEN AND EVERYONE MUST DO WHAT I SAY, please
help me, Doctor, I can't stop saying that."
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 23:43:25 -0400, "MF"
<cheatsandlies RemoveThis @spammersbl0w.com> wrote:

>
>"kony" <spam RemoveThis @spam.com> wrote in message
>news:b8s46318ls6fr0059fdak6d1eecubflut1@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 23:28:30 -0400, "MF"
>> <cheatsandlies RemoveThis @spammersbl0w.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Yeah, but think of it like this.
>>>>
>>
>> There's no "think of it like this". The proper form was
>> explained so at this point you're just inable to learn
>> anything. There is nothing you could post that changes
>> this.
>
>Well, what I said in the post that _you improperly snipped_ was a joke.
>
>But, dolt, there is _always_ "think of it like this."
>


Boo hoo, you're unhappy, write a letter to someone who
cares.
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU? 

> It is totally unnecessary to cope with mixed top/bottom posting or
> top-posting in general. The objective is clear - snip and
> bottom/inline post.

Funny, but that is EXACTLY what you are doing.
 >> Stay informed about: What is my real CPU?