 |
|
 |
|
Next: A7N8X-E
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Sep 07, 2004 Posts: 180
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 12:12 am
Post subject: VIA twin-core processor Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>chips (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 09, 2004 Posts: 829
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:11 am
Post subject: Re: VIA twin-core processor [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:55:55 -0400, "Yousuf Khan" <bbbl67.TakeThisOut@ezrs.com> wrote:
>http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id%3B311116776%3Bfp%3B2%3Bfpid%3B1
>
Hmm, this initial effort looks more like a MCM compared with what Intel &
AMD are doing. I wonder how that -- a twin core -- will sit with M$'s dual
core processor policy?
Rgds, George Macdonald
"Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: VIA twin-core processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 18, 2004 Posts: 728
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:11 am
Post subject: Re: VIA twin-core processor [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:23:29 -0400, George Macdonald
<fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks@tellurian.com> wrote:
>
>On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:55:55 -0400, "Yousuf Khan" <bbbl67.RemoveThis@ezrs.com> wrote:
>
>>http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id%3B311116776%3Bfp%3B2%3Bfpid%3B1
>>
>
>Hmm, this initial effort looks more like a MCM compared with what Intel &
>AMD are doing. I wonder how that -- a twin core -- will sit with M$'s dual
>core processor policy?
My understanding of the MS' licensing policy is 1 socket = 1 CPU
license, so this MCM would still just be single "chip". Of course,
I'm sure that Microsoft's actual policy will end up being ~100 pages
long, impossible to read without an entire team of lawyers and still
subject to change on a whim, so I don't know that it will matter much.
-------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: VIA twin-core processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 07, 2004 Posts: 180
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:14 am
Post subject: Re: VIA twin-core processor [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
George Macdonald wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:55:55 -0400, "Yousuf Khan" <bbbl67.DeleteThis@ezrs.com>
> wrote:
>
<font color=green> >> <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id%3B311116776%3Bfp%3B2%3Bfpid%3B1</font" target="_blank">http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id%3B311116776%3Bfp%3B2%3Bfpid...1</f</a>>
>>
>
> Hmm, this initial effort looks more like a MCM compared with what
> Intel & AMD are doing. I wonder how that -- a twin core -- will sit
> with M$'s dual core processor policy?
If they use the Hyperthreading API, then MS will simply think it's a single
processor.
Yousuf Khan<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: VIA twin-core processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 16, 2003 Posts: 125
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:19 pm
Post subject: Re: VIA twin-core processor [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
George Macdonald wrote:
>
> Hmm, this initial effort looks more like a MCM compared with what
> Intel & AMD are doing. I wonder how that -- a twin core -- will sit
> with M$'s dual core processor policy?
George, I think the reporter misunderstood what the Via guy was
explaining to him. MCMs are damned expensive, just for the package -
and expensive is not Via's thing at all. I believe this thing is one
chip/dual core all the way, esp. at 90 nanometers.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: VIA twin-core processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 09, 2004 Posts: 829
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 7:58 pm
Post subject: Re: VIA twin-core processor [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:08:55 GMT, "Felger Carbon" <fmsfnf.TakeThisOut@jfoops.net>
wrote:
>George Macdonald wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, this initial effort looks more like a MCM compared with what
>> Intel & AMD are doing. I wonder how that -- a twin core -- will sit
>> with M$'s dual core processor policy?
>
>George, I think the reporter misunderstood what the Via guy was
>explaining to him. MCMs are damned expensive, just for the package -
>and expensive is not Via's thing at all. I believe this thing is one
>chip/dual core all the way, esp. at 90 nanometers.
Hmm, maybe a mini-MCM??... hard to tell if they intended to do the "twin
core" on a sinlge die or not.
Slightly OT: this will go down very well in their target market of PRC and
other far-east countries. I dunno if you've seen what the Chinese font
sets do to performance of a single CPU; having a 2nd CPU to handle things
will be a big win.
Rgds, George Macdonald
"Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: VIA twin-core processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 09, 2004 Posts: 482
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:28 pm
Post subject: Re: VIA twin-core processor [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:08:55 +0000, Felger Carbon wrote:
> George Macdonald wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, this initial effort looks more like a MCM compared with what
>> Intel & AMD are doing. I wonder how that -- a twin core -- will sit
>> with M$'s dual core processor policy?
>
> George, I think the reporter misunderstood what the Via guy was
> explaining to him. MCMs are damned expensive, just for the package -
> and expensive is not Via's thing at all. I believe this thing is one
> chip/dual core all the way, esp. at 90 nanometers.
I found this amazing, as well. Not only are MCM packages *extremely*
expensice (particularly for the bottom-feeeeders like Via), but the yeald
loss isn't pretty either. Shirly they're not that hard up!
--
Keith<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: VIA twin-core processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | AMD to demonstrate dual-core chips - AMD to demonstrate dual-core chips By Michael Kanellos CNET News.com August 30, 2004, 9:00 PM PT Aiming to deflate archrival Intel, Advanced Micro Devices this week will show off its dual-core chips, which will start to trickle out toward the middle of....
dual-core Opteron tape out begins - http://anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=2081 Yousuf Khan -- Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com Spambots: just reply to this email address ;-)
Pentium 4 dual-core details emerge - Looks like Intel's dual-core P4 processors will be codenamed Paxville and Dempsey. Yousuf Khan ----- http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2004Aug/bch20040817026514.htm <quote> Again, AMD is setting the bar for future processor technology, but t...
How bad is SMP with 2 different processor speeds? - I have a dual-capable SBC CPU board which accepts Socket 370 CPUs and I happen to have 2 Pentium III cpus, one is 700MHz and the other is 800MHz. What are the chances that I'd be able to run, say, Linux or Win2K with this combination? TIA Norm
IBM Netfinity 5000 Processor upgrade - Hi, I've just "inherited" (ok, liberated from a skip), the companies IBM Netfinity 5000, it has a single P3 500 (slot 1) CPU (100mhz). Question is, the board is 100mhz only and supports dual processors. I am aware of the VRM required to go mul... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|